“佐贺的福赛特”原本是为它的一部分是被称为注定的标题是“产权人”，并采取了福赛特家庭收集的编年史它纵容了Forsytean坚韧，这是符合我们所有人。佐贺一词可能反对，理由是它蕴含的英雄，而在这些网页上有小的英雄气概。但它用于一个合适的讽刺和，毕竟，这漫长的故事，虽然它可能处理的工装外套，furbelows民间，和一个绝好时期，是不是冲突缺乏必要的巡逻。扣除了巨大的身材和血液旧天口渴，因为他们已经回落童话故事和传说给我们，旧萨加斯民间的福尔赛，稳妥，在他们的占有欲的本能，并作为对进出的小证明美和斯威森，索姆斯，甚至年轻的Jolyon激情。如果英雄人物，日子从来没有人，似乎惊吓从他们的周围环境不相称的方式出了维多利亚时代福赛特，我们可以确信，即使在当时是部落本能的首要力量，而“家庭”和意识的家园和财产算作他们做这一天，所有的努力，最近“讲出来。”
    因此，许多人都写了，并声称他们的家庭的福尔的，一个几乎被鼓励相信在一个想象的物种的典型性正本。礼仪的变化和发展模式，及“提摩太在贝斯沃特路”的变成了必需品，在令人难以置信的巢除外;我们不要小看它想再次，也或许在这样一个詹姆斯或旧Jolyon之一。然而，保险业社团和法官的言论数字向我们保证，我们的人间天堂每天仍是富人的特权，其中野生袭击者，美容和激情，偷来的，我们的鼻子底下窃取的安全。作为一个肯定的狗将在铜管乐队的树皮，以便将人性的本质索姆斯永远不安地站起来反对解散一直徘徊轮所有权的褶皱。
    “让已逝的过去埋葬死者”会是一个更好的，如果说过去曾经死去。在过去人们的持续是这些故事选择，漫画祝福，每个新时代否认即将到口过分自信的舞台，它以一个完美的新颖性要求，一。
    ====
    "The Forsyte Saga" was the title originally destined for that part of it which is called "The Man of Property"; and to adopt it for the collected chronicles of the Forsyte family has indulged the Forsytean tenacity that is in all of us. The word Saga might be objected to on the ground that it connotes the heroic and that there is little heroism in these pages. But it is used with a suitable irony; and, after all, this long tale, though it may deal with folk in frock coats, furbelows, and a gilt-edged period, is not devoid of the essential beat of conflict. Discounting for the gigantic stature and blood-thirstiness of old days, as they have come down to us in fairy-tale and legend, the folk of the old Sagas were Forsytes, assuredly, in their possessive instincts, and as little proof against the inroads of beauty and passion as Swithin, Soames, or even Young Jolyon. And if heroic figures, in days that never were, seem to startle out from their surroundings in fashion unbecoming to a Forsyte of the Victorian era, we may be sure that tribal instinct was even then the prime force, and that "family" and the sense of home and property counted as they do to this day, for all the recent efforts to "talk them out."
    So many people have written and claimed that their families were the originals of the Forsytes that one has been almost encouraged to believe in the typicality of an imagined species. Manners change and modes evolve, and "Timothy's on the Bayswater Road" becomes a nest of the unbelievable in all except essentials; we shall not look upon its like again, nor perhaps on such a one as James or Old Jolyon. And yet the figures of Insurance Societies and the utterances of Judges reassure us daily that our earthly paradise is still a rich preserve, where the wild raiders, Beauty and Passion, come stealing in, filching security from beneath our noses. As surely as a dog will bark at a brass band, so will the essential Soames in human nature ever rise up uneasily against the dissolution which hovers round the folds of ownership.
    "Let the dead Past bury its dead" would be a better saying if the Past ever died. The persistence of the Past is one of those tragi-comic blessings which each new age denies, coming cocksure on to the stage to mouth its claim to a perfect novelty.